
ENQUAL’s experience reflects repeated responsibility at inspection-critical decision points—where design intent must be explained, risk ownership demonstrated, verification justified, and system behavior defended under regulatory scrutiny. This work spans development, remediation, and post-market sustainment for medical device and combination product organizations operating under FDA and EU oversight.
The experience below is organized by the inspection-critical systems most frequently challenged during FDA inspections and Notified Body reviews—design control, risk linkage, verification/validation adequacy, supplier control, and post-market signal response.
Interpretive context for inspections:
My work focuses on the inspection-critical moments: design intent, risk ownership, verification adequacy, supplier control, and post-market signal response. The goal is simple—clear decisions, objective evidence, and traceability that holds up under FDA or Notified Body scrutiny.
Education:
B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester
Additional Credentials:
ASQ approved Black Belt, GxP Compliance, Product Realization, and Design Control professional
Inspection focus: design intent, traceability, and verification rationale
Inspection focus: CAPA effectiveness, DHF integrity, and regulatory decision-making
Inspection focus: supplier control, system integration, and execution under oversight
Schedule a Discovery call to confirm scope, identify the highest-risk decision points, and align on a defensible engagement plan.